|
|
Those who have ears, hear!
|
+++ WELCOME +++ |
The disciples said to Jesus: tell us what the kingdom
of heaven is like.
He said to them: it is like a mustard seed -- smaller than all seeds, but when it falls on
the tilled earth it produces a large tree and becomes shelter for all the birds of heaven.
Human relationships
have changed a lot, and have changed for the worse. In all dimensions the deeper relationships have disappeared: the wife
is no longer a wife, but just a girlfriend; the husband is no longer a husband, but just a boyfriend. Friendship is
good, but cannot be very deep. Marriage is something which happens in depth. It is a commitment in depth, and unless you
commit yourself you remain shallow. Unless you commit yourself you never take the jump. You can float on the surface,
but the depths are not for you.
Of course, to go into the depths is dangerous -- bound to be so, because on
the surface you are very efficient. On the surface you can work like an automaton; no awareness is needed. But you will
have to be more and more alert, the more you penetrate into the depths, because at every moment death is possible.
Fear of depth has created a shallowness in all relationships. They have become juvenile.
A boyfriend or a girlfriend
may be fun, but cannot become a door to the deepest that is hidden in each and everyone. With a girlfriend you can be
sexually related, but love cannot grow. Love needs deep roots. Sexuality is possible on the surface, but sexuality
is just animal, biological. It can be beautiful if it is part of a deeper love, but if it is not part of a deeper love
it is the most ugly thing possible; the ugliest, because then there is no communion -- you simply touch each other
and separate. Only bodies meet, but not you -- not I, not thou. This has happened in all relationships.
But the
greatest relationship has completely disappeared, and the greatest relationship is between a master and a disciple.
You
will not be able to understand Jesus if you cannot understand the dimension of that relationship which exists between
a master and his disciples. That has completely disappeared. The wife is substituted by a girlfriend, the husband
is substituted by a boyfriend, but the master, and the relationship that exists between him and his disciples, has completely
disappeared. Or, this relationship has been substituted by a very contrary thing that exists between a psychiatrist
and his patient.
Between a psychiatrist and his patient a relationship exists which is bound to be ill, pathological
-- because a patient comes not in search of truth, is really not in search of health . This word health is very meaningful:
it means wholeness, it means holiness, it means a deep healing in the self. A patient does not come for health, because
if he comes for health he cannot be anything other than a disciple. A patient comes to get rid of the illness; the attitude
is totally negative. He has come just to be forced to become normal again, just to become a working part of the normal
world again. He has become maladjusted; he needs adjustment and the psychiatrist helps him to be adjusted again. But
adjusted to whom? Adjusted to this world, this society, which is absolutely ill.
What you call the "normal" human
being is nothing but normal pathology or normal madness, normal insanity.
The "normal" man is also insane, but
insane within the boundaries, the accepted boundaries of the society, of the culture. Somebody sometimes trespasses,
goes beyond the boundaries -- then he becomes ill. Then the whole society, which is ill, says that this man is ill. And
the psychiatrist exists on the boundary to help this man back, back to the crowd.
The psychiatrist cannot be the
master, because he himself is not whole. And the patient cannot be the disciple, because he has not come to learn. He
is disturbed, and he does not want to be disturbed; his effort is only for adjustment, not for health. The psychiatrist
cannot be the master, although in the West he is pretending to be, and sooner or later he will pretend that he is
the master in the East too. But he cannot be -- he himself is ill. He may help others to be adjusted, and that’s
okay: one ill man can help another ill man, in some ways. But one ill man cannot bring another man who is ill to be
whole; one madman cannot help another madman to go beyond madness.
Even your Freuds, your Jungs, your Adlers,
are absolutely ill; not only ordinary psychiatrists, but the greatest of them are ill and pathological. I will tell
you a few things so you can feel it. Whenever somebody mentioned anything about death, Freud would start trembling. Twice
he even fainted and fell down from his chair just because somebody was talking about mummies in Egypt. He fainted!
And another time also, Jung was talking about death, corpses, and suddenly Freud trembled and fell down, fainted, became
unconscious. If death was such a fear to Freud, what about his disciples?
And why should death be such a fear?
Can you conceive of a Buddha being afraid of death? Then he would no longer be a Buddha.
Jung has reported
that many times he wanted to go to Rome to visit the Vatican and particularly the library, the Vatican’s library,
which is the greatest, which has the most secret records of all the religions that have existed -- very rare. But
whenever he went to purchase the ticket he would start trembling -- just going to Rome! What will happen when you go to
moksha? He would cancel the ticket and come back. He never went, never. Many times he tried, and in the end he decided:
"No, I cannot go."
What is the fear, going to Rome? Why is a psychiatrist afraid of going to religion? Because
Rome is just the symbol, the representative. And this Jung had created a philosophy around his mind, and that philosophy
was afraid of being shattered. It is just as if a camel is afraid to go to the Himalayas, because when a camel comes
near the Himalayas, for the first time he comes to know that he is nothing. This whole philosophy that Jung has created
is just childish. Man has created such vast, cosmic systems, and all those systems are in ruins now. The fear is that
going to Rome means going to the ruins of the great systems that the past has created.
What about your small system?
What about this small corner that you have cleaned and decorated? What about your philosophy?
Great philosophies
have tumbled down and gone to dust: go to Rome, see what has happened! Go to Athens, see what has happened! Where are
the schools of Aristotle and Plato and Socrates? All have disappeared into dust. The greatest systems in the end come
to dust; all thoughts finally prove to be useless, because thought is just a man-created thing.
Only in "no-thought"
do you come to know the divine.
Through thought you cannot come to know the eternal, because thought is of time.
Thought cannot be of the eternal; no philosophy, no system of thought can be eternal. That was the fear.
At least
four or five times Jung made reservations and canceled. And this man Jung is one of the greatest psychiatrists. If he
was so afraid of going to Rome, what about his disciples? Even you are not afraid -- not because you are better than
Jung, but just because you are more unaware. He was aware that in Rome his head would come down; the moment he looked
at the ruins of all the great systems, a trembling, a fear of death -- that: "What will happen to my system? What
will happen to me?" would take hold. He trembles and comes back, and in his memoirs he writes: "Then finally I dropped
the whole project. I am not going to Rome."
The same thing happened to Freud many times. He also tried to go to Rome
-- so it does not seem to be just a coincidence -- and he also was afraid. Why? Freud was as angry as you can be,
Freud was as sexual as you can be, as scared of death as you can be, as neurotic in his behavior as you can be, so
what is the difference? He may have been a more intelligent man, may have been a genius perhaps, or he could help a little,
but he was as blind as you are as far as the ultimate is concerned, as far as the secretmost, innermost core of being
is concerned.
No, psychiatry cannot become religion.
It may become a good hospital, but it cannot become the
temple -- it is not possible. And a psychiatrist may be needed because people are ill, maladjusted, but a psychiatrist
is not a master and a patient is not a disciple. If you come to a master as a patient then you will miss, because a master
is not a psychiatrist. I am not a psychiatrist.
People come to me and they say: "I am suffering from this mental anxiety,
neurosis, this and that."
I say: "It is okay, because I am not going to treat your anxiety, I am going to
treat you. I am not concerned with your diseases, I am simply concerned with you. Diseases are on the periphery, and there
is no disease where you are."
Once you come to realize who you are, all diseases disappear.
They exist
basically because you have been hiding self-knowledge, you have been avoiding yourself; you have been avoiding the basic
encounter because you don’t want to look at yourself. Why don’t you want to look at yourself? What has
happened to you? Unless you are ready to encounter yourself you cannot become a disciple, because a master can do nothing
if you are not ready to face yourself. He can only help you to face yourself.
Why are you so afraid? Because something
has gone wrong somewhere in the past. A child is born and he is not accepted as he is. Many things have to be changed,
forced; he has to be disciplined. He has many parts which the society and his parents cannot accept, so those parts have
to be denied, repressed; only a few parts can be accepted and appreciated. So the child has to work it out. He has
to deny many fragments of his being which cannot be allowed manifestation. He has to deny them so much that he himself
becomes unaware of them. This is what repression is, and the whole society exists on repression.
The greater part
of the being of the child has to be repressed, completely thrown into the dark. But that repressed part asserts itself,
tries to rebel, react; it wants to come into the light and you have to force it back again and again. So you become
afraid to encounter yourself, because what will happen to the repressed part? That will come again, that will be there.
What will happen to the unconscious? If you encounter yourself the unconscious will be there, all that you have denied
will be there. And that gives you fear.
Unless a child is accepted totally as he or she is, this fear is bound to
remain. But no society has yet existed which accepts a child totally -- and it seems that no society will ever exist
which will accept a child totally, because it is almost impossible. So repression is bound to be there, more or less.
And everybody has to face, some day, this problem of facing oneself. You become disciples the very day you forget about
what is good, what is bad; you forget about what is accepted, what is not accepted. You only become a disciple the
day you are ready to expose your whole being to yourself.
The master is just a midwife.
He helps you to
pass through a new birth, to be reborn. And what is the relationship between a master and a disciple? A disciple has to
trust; he cannot doubt. If he doubts, then he cannot expose himself. When you doubt somebody you shrink; you cannot
expand. When you doubt . A stranger is there, then you close yourself; you cannot be open because you don’t know
what this stranger is going to do to you. You cannot be vulnerable before him; you have to protect yourself and create
an armor.
With a master you have to drop the armor completely -- that much is a must. Even with a lover you may
carry your armor a little; before a beloved you may not be so open. But with a master the openness has to be total, otherwise
nothing will happen. If you withhold even a little part of yourself the relationship is not there. Total trust is needed,
only then can the secrets be revealed, only then can the keys be offered to you. But if you are hiding yourself, that
means you are fighting with the master, and then nothing can be done.
Struggle is not the key with the master,
surrender is the key.
And surrender has disappeared from the world completely. Many things have helped it: for
three or four centuries man has been taught to be individualistic, egoistic; man has been taught not to surrender but
to fight; not to obey but to rebel; man has been taught not to trust but to doubt. There has been a reason for it:
it is because science grows through doubt. Science is deep skepticism. It works not through trust; it works through logic,
argument, doubt. The more you doubt, the more scientific you become. The path is the very opposite of the religious path.
Religion works through trust: the more you trust, the more religious you become. Science has worked miracles and
those miracles are very visible. Religion has worked greater miracles, but those miracles are not so visible. Even
if a Buddha is there, what can you feel? What can you see? He is not visible -- visibly, he is just a body; visibly, he
is just as mortal as you are; visibly, he will become old and die one day. Invisibly, he is deathless. But you don’t
have the eyes to see that which is invisible, you don’t have the capacity to feel the innermost, the unknown. That
is why only trusting eyes, by and by, start to feel and become sensitive. When you trust, it means closing these two
eyes. That is why trust is blind, just like love is blind -- but trust is even more blind than love.
When you
close both these eyes, what happens?
An inner transformation happens. When you close these eyes which see outwardly,
what happens to the energy which goes through the eyes? That energy starts moving backwards. It cannot flow from the eyes
towards objects, so it starts turning, it becomes a turning. Energy has to move, energy cannot be static; if you close
one outlet, it starts finding another.
When both eyes are closed, the energy that was moving through these two eyes
starts turning -- a conversion happens. That energy hits the third eye in you. The third eye is not a physical thing:
it is just that the energy that moves through the eyes towards outside objects is now returning towards the source.
It becomes the third eye, the third way of seeing the world. Only through that third eye is a Buddha seen; only through
that third eye is a Jesus realized. If you don’t have that third eye, Jesus will be there but you will miss
him -- many missed him.
In his home town, people thought that Jesus was just that carpenter Joseph’s son.
Nobody, nobody could recognize what had happened to this man: that he was no longer the carpenter’s son,
that he had become God’s son. That is an inner phenomenon. And when Jesus declared: "I am the son of the divine,
my father is in heaven," people laughed and said: "Either you have gone mad, or you are a fool or a very cunning man.
How can a carpenter’s son suddenly become God’s son?" But there is a way .
Only the body is born out
of the body. The inner self is not born out of the body, it is born of the holy ghost, it is of the divine. But first
you have to attain the eyes to see, you have to attain the ears to hear.
It is a very delicate affair to understand
Jesus; you have to pass through a great training.
It is just like understanding classical music. If suddenly you
are allowed to listen to classical music for the first time you will feel: "What nonsense is going on?" It is so delicate,
a long training is needed. You have to be an apprentice for many, many years; only then are your ears trained to catch
the subtle -- and then there is nothing like classical music. Then ordinary day-to-day music, like film music, is
not music at all; it is just noise, and that too, foolish. Because your ears are not trained you live with that noise
and you think it is music. But for classical music you need very aristocratic ears. A training is needed, and the
more you are trained, the more the subtle becomes visible.
But classical music is nothing before a Jesus, because
that is the cosmic music. You have to be so silent that there is not a single flicker of thought, not a single movement
in your being; only then can you hear Jesus, can you understand Jesus, can you know him.
Jesus goes on repeating
again and again: "Those who have ears should be able to understand me. Those who have eyes, see! I am here!" Why does
he go on repeating: "Those who have eyes, see! Those who have ears, hear!" why? He is talking of some other dimension
of understanding only a disciple can understand.
Very few understood Jesus, but that is in the very nature of
things and bound to be so. Very few -- and who were those few? They were not learned scholars, no; they were not professors
of the universities, no; they were not pundits or philosophers, no. They were ordinary people: a fisherman, a farmer,
a shoemaker, a prostitute -- they were very ordinary people, most ordinary, the most ordinary of ordinaries.
Why
could these people understand? There must be something extraordinary in an ordinary man. There must be something special
which exists in an ordinary man and disappears in so-called "extraordinaries." What is this? It is a humbleness, a
trust.
The more you are trained in the intellect, the less trust is possible; when you are not trained in the
intellect, more trust is possible.
A farmer trusts, he has no need to doubt. He sows the seeds in the field and he
trusts they will come up, they will sprout when the right season comes. They will sprout. He waits and he prays, and in
the right season those seeds sprout and they become plants. He waits and he trusts. He lives with the trees, plants,
rivers, mountains. There is no need to doubt: trees are not cunning, you need no armor around you to protect yourself
from them; hills are not cunning -- they are not politicians, they are not criminals -- you need no armor to protect
yourself from them. You do not need any security there, you can be open.
That is why when you go to the hills
you suddenly feel a rapture. From where does it come? From the hills? No, it comes because now you can put the armor
aside, there is no need to be afraid. When you go to a tree suddenly you feel beautiful. It is not coming from the tree,
it is coming from within you. But with a tree there is no need to protect yourself, you can be at ease and at home.
The flower is not going to suddenly attack you; the tree cannot be a thief, it cannot steal anything from you. So when
you go to the hills, to the sea, to the trees, to the forest, you put aside your armor.
People who live with
nature are more trusting.
A country which is less industrialized, less mechanized, less technological, lives more
with nature, has more trust in it. That is why you cannot conceive of Jesus being born in New York -- almost impossible.
Jesus freaks can be born there, but not Jesus. And these "freaks" are just neurotic; Jesus is just an excuse. No,
you cannot think of Jesus being born there, it is almost impossible. And even if he were born there, no one would listen
to him; even if he were there, nobody would be able to recognize him. He was born in an age without technology, without
science, the son of a carpenter. He lived his whole life with poor, simple people who were living with nature. They
could trust.
Jesus comes to the lake one day, early in the morning. The sun has not yet come up over the horizon.
Two fishermen are there and they have just thrown their net to catch fish when Jesus comes and says: "Look! Why are you
wasting your life? I can make you fishers of men. Why are you wasting your energy on fishing for fish? I can make you
catchers of men, fishers of men. Come, follow me!"
If he had said that to you when you were sitting in your office
or in your shop, you would have said: "Go away! I don’t have any time. Don’t waste my time!" But those
two fishermen looked at Jesus; they looked at Jesus without any doubt. The sun was rising and the man was beautiful, this
man Jesus. And his eyes -- they were deeper than the lake, and his radiance was greater than the sun. They threw away
their nets and they followed Jesus.
+++
John
|
|
|