CHARLES: MODEL FOR GLOBAL SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Jun 22 (1 day ago)
to LighttoParadis.
(SUPERHUMAN MINISTRY Service Sector)
CWM #46, March 29,2012 (paragraph, modif.)
Sustainable social practices
CHARLES: Would you like me to explain that
term more clearly? (MMc: Please.)
For instance, let us say that global economists
got together and realized that what they were doing as separate nations, as separate economies was not supporting the economic
stability and sustainability of the world. They then came together and decided to examine whether there were certain
economic practices or decisions that were necessary to support national economies, while supporting the global economy, and
that they were inseparable. When they broke up they went back to their home countries and began to practice making decisions
that supported the global economy and that also supported their national economy. Of course, you realize that these
economists would be criticized by the home population and home politicians, because they were making decisions which were
not totally oriented towards that national economy, but pointed towards other economies as well. The rationale that
the economists would use is that by solely making decisions or practices that are oriented towards the national economy worked
against the global economy that would [not] become stable and sustainable. And so, they would be able to eventually
turn the opinion of politicians and corporate leaders and financiers and the financial community toward thinking of the larger
economy of the world that must be served by these practices, which support a sustainable global economy, which in turn supports
and benefits national economies. This is perhaps the area of social activity now, which is more capable of becoming
a model for global social sustainability than any other social institution.
The most divergent one is national sovereignty and
the military actions that nations take to protect their sovereignty, militarily. It seems so painfully ironic that a
nation could be so militaristic, but be so interested also in economic stability at the same time. In a larger-minded
world, you will find that these are not separate, that they affect each other, and that the global economy affects your militarism
and your militarism affects your global economy. A benefit for all is that there would be practices or decisions that
are made by local individuals, national individuals and international individuals that contribute to the global economy and
which everyone seeks to have a stable, prosperous, sustainable global economy that helps everyone.