PR
Conversations with Monjoronson #61 – We must
now act - Sept. 28, 2012
Topics:
Why are the celestials helping us?
It is your actions that count the most
Intentions, decisions and actions make a difference
Make a decision to form a team—or not
Social bonding
Taking the initial steps to form a team
Celestial expectations are less than your own
Operational and functional design teams
The rewards will be huge!
The spiritual quality of the team
The intentions of “Healing a broken world”
The requirement of co-creative participation
The main thrust is social regeneration through
spiritual influence
Celestial intent is global
A book of celestial teachings concerning social
sustainability
Seeking clarification on an old recommendation
Books planned for publication
Concerning the announcement of disintegration
of your societies
What is next? A pause to see what the audience
does
We are not being abandoned by the celestials
TR: Daniel
Raphael
Moderator: Michael
McCray (MMc)
Prayer: Heavenly
Father, Michael, Nebadonia, our Planetary Supreme, Urantia, we ask you to be with us today, as you are with us every
day, as we entertain our Avonal Son and his staff in a question and answer period that is this venue, called, “Conversations
with Monjoronson.” We thank you for this opportunity and would like to tell you of our great appreciation. We have learned
a great deal in this time and we hope to learn a great deal more. Thank you very much!
MMc: Monjoronson, are you there?
MONJORONSON: Good morning, yes I am.
MMc: I hope you heard us talking a little bit
earlier about the questions that we have in our minds about where do we go from here? But before we start into that question,
is there anything that you would like to say to us?
Why are the celestials helping us?
MONJORONSON: Yes, I do and it is an oft-repeated
message from the earliest days of your awareness of the Correcting Time, and that is the answer to the question, “Why
are we doing this?” One is for information, and secondly, that information is to assist you to prepare yourself to be
of service to your own ascendant career by being in service to Christ Michael in the Correcting Time. Through your participation
of service in this work, we all can bring this world into the days of light and life. These words are more than mere intellectual
curiosities or entertainment or inspiration; they are pragmatic designs, pragmatic words urging you to take action, for without
action there is no completion. We have made our decisions; we have made our plans; and we are taking actions now. And so,
we are sitting on the teeter-totter of the Correcting Time, and we are waiting for you to climb on board to “play with
us,” to swing up and down on the teeter-totter as we engage this dialog in real life terms of service. We are thoroughly
committed to service, as we hope you will be.
Yes, for those in the morontial realm, this act of
service is a process of serving their ascendant career as they learn more and more about universe administration, yet it takes
the individual at the lowest levels, one-on-one with you and your celestial teachers to assist you, to raise you to a level
where you can appreciate your total ascendant career, and that this earthly era is a highly important one that will set the
stage for all of your morontial existence, until you enter the spiritual phase of your metamorphosis.
It is your actions that count
the most
It is one thing to learn; it is another thing to chart
out the options for decision-making; and it is another to make a decision. Yet, in the criteria that God judges you, that
you are held accountable, it is your actions in the material plane that count most, whether it is for service of omission
or service of commission; whether it is sins of omission or sins of commission—the weight of your soul is decided upon
the actions that you take. However, in the morontial realm, your weight of survival is weighed upon the actions of your mind,
the decisions and actions you take in your mind, the thoughts that you have in your mind. You are not held to that higher
standard of performance yet, but one day you will, and of course you will be guided and taught how to teach and train your
mind how to become more and more in conformance with God’s Will, and in conformance with the universal harmonic that
exists in the universe, which you define and have titled as “love.”
Intentions, decisions and actions
make a difference
So, my friends, this work of healing your world will
not go forward until you take action. You are even given credit for your intentions, which is quite wonderful, that takes
into consideration the nature of where you live. God is so generous as to give you credit for the intentions you hold. We
do not hold you to a higher standard, but we do anticipate and even have expectations that you will take action upon your
decisions. And so, it is upon your decisions that the initiation of the Correcting Time, through the lessons we have been
teaching you, will succeed or fail. Eventually, we know that we will succeed, but “you” make the difference between
decades, centuries and millennia; it is your decision and actions to make the difference. One day, when you are in the morontial
realm, you will be thoroughly apprised of the effect of your decisions and of your intentions, and your failure to have intentions
to make decisions and take actions. You will be shown very clearly how your personal decision and action would have made a
difference in the opening era of the days of light and life. This is measurable, it is predictable, it is a known factor to
us; that is why we are here now, at this most critical time in Urantia’s history and its future.
MMc: Considering what you just said, and what
you told us at the last session, the question that I have is: You would very much like to see us become active in design teams,
working with you to help forward this planet into light and life, or the early stages of that.
MONJORONSON: That is correct. Continue your
questions.
MMc: I’m wondering where this venue is
going? Where would you like to take it from here? What topics would you like to discuss, or would you like to turn this into
the pragmatic questions from the design teams, that we might ask you, here in this venue?
MONJORONSON: Yes, you anticipate by several
weeks or months, what we have seen ahead, and that as teams gather together, that they will have ongoing questions about the
team process. Many of those questions will be answered by our resident expert, Sondjah Melchizedek, and otherwise answered
by Charles and Avila. But Sondjah is the one with the most experiential history with this process, working with mortals.
Make a decision to form a team—or
not
Let us come back earlier to the more immediate present
time, and let me address our concerns for you now. And I say “you,” as in individuals, rather than the collective
“you.” You, as individuals who have been reading these transcripts about social sustainability and the design
team, and the design team process, now are prepared to make a decision to initiate a team, or enter into the earliest efforts
of initiating a team—or not. We wish that you would not equivocate; we would wish that you would not sit on the fence.
If you make a decision not to enter into it, then that is your decision and there is nothing held against you, and there is
no guilt involved [that is] necessary on your part. However, if you are considering the possibilities or even the marginal
possibilities of initiating a team, then please, make that decision and state that out loud in your prayer time, or as you
read this, this very moment. I will pause so that you can take a moment to think about that, make a decision, and to take
action. (Long pause.)
Taking the initial steps to
form a team
For those of you who have decided that you would like
to do this, or you are inclined to do this, there are some very initial steps to begin. You have made the decision; you have
said that you would like to and it is your intention to initiate a team, and that you would like to proceed. The most elementary
way to proceed is to discuss the possibility of learning about social sustainability with your friends. Of course, if you
have no friends, then it is rather a moot point. Those with friends, you are recommended to talk with your friends to see
if they would be interested in discussing social sustainability and learning about that. You can approach this very gently,
very slowly; it doesn’t require commitment to a team, at this point, but merely a time to invite friends to your home
or to the club house at your condominium residence situation, or apartment, sub-division, or just in the parameters of your
living room with friends to discuss this and to find if there is a common thread of interest in some social issue that you
are concerned about. Whether it is delinquency, schools, teen pregnancies, drug use, disintegrated families, and so on. There
are at least a thousand different social topics that you could discuss.
Social bonding
The important thing is that you find a commonality
among all people that you discover. This is the beginning of the social bonding process that will eventually become the hub
and center of your design team. This must be developed first, before any discussion about a team is developed to any extent.
Of course, when you bring people together who want to discuss these issues, you must be prepared also, that you will attract
some very intelligent minds, and anyone with a modicum of intelligence will ask you, “Well, how do you see this as proceeding?”
You would then discuss that you had been given some materials that would outline a design team, and that there are certain
functions in it, and that these roles and functions help the team process to reach conclusions, recommendations and findings.
Some people will be intrigued with that; some people, of course, will be put off by it. So, there is a sorting and sifting
of individuals who eventually end up on the team, and eventually some do not, but it is your effort to begin this process.
Even if you are unsuccessful, the decisions, the actions
to fulfill your intentions to assist Christ Michael are highly meaningful. You are not held responsible for the circumstances
of developing a team in your social environment when those circumstances are not fortuitous to that eventuality. We do anticipate,
and hope that you will try, and then if it is unsuccessful, that you will see how you can contribute in some way in your own
community, perhaps in another situation. Is this clear so far? (MMc: Yes, it is.)
Celestial expectations are less
than your own
We are not expecting to train you to become highly
competent team members yet, but we simply want to train you in the very beginnings of learning how to organize a team, with
the eventuality after several meetings, that you would begin to accept the harness of each role, whether it is as facilitator
or as an inquiring member, or other role. You oftentimes expect too much too soon of yourself and of your friends. The social
process is oftentimes slow, but as long as you are methodical and regular, you will find that you will make progress. If you
are unable to make progress, then that would be the opportunity to ask questions of Sondjah. He is the principle individual
I would point you to in this regard; he is our “growing library,” so to speak, a living library of experience
of working with design teams. You do not need to worry about overwhelming him or making a minute-by-minute appointment with
him; simply call him in to assist you. If you “hear” him, fine, if you do not, he will still be there to assist
you and guide you in the ways that he can.
Lastly, in this brief description of this beginning,
is that this is one of the requirements that we see of the design teams, is that you meet physically, in person, and that
you engage each other personally to build this social organism of the design team. There will be occasions, however, when
you can continue your research apart from each other, but eventually, and before long, you must meet again in person to continue
this process. It has many parameters to it when you meet in person. I know that you have friends in other states with whom
you collaborate, and we recommend to you to collaborate with each other on how each of you in different states can progress
in your team initiation in your own local area. This way, you have a secondary team through the Internet, advising each of
you in your local social environment, how to generate progress in your local teams.
Operational and functional design
teams
The second part of this discussion is that the generation
of an operational design team becomes a social organism, which we spoke of last time, in our last session. This is true: When
a fully operational and functional design team, where members are self-observing, self-monitoring and self-correcting, and
engage in positive thinking and are constructive in their comments and their contributions, this is the emulation of an individual
who has these same capabilities, talents and expressions in their personal, social, spiritual and emotional life. So, the
team environment provides you with a living, working, training environment for guiding your own emotional, social and spiritually
developing evolution. We encourage you to participate in the team environment as a means of growing within the potential you
have as a mortal. You are growing towards the morontial, and this is truly one of the most immediately functional areas where
you can do so. Many of you have made much progress towards the morontial on your own, in your own meditative state, as you
are self-observing, self-monitoring and self-correcting of your thinking and your behavior and your speech, but in the team
environment you have an operational social environment where you can practice those in real time, without the “slippery
fish” of your thoughts that can easily lead you astray, thinking you are doing well when you are not. Do you understand?
MMc: Yes, I do. It is a matter of realizing
some difficulty for the individual in putting the intent into action, but the rewards are great also.
The rewards will be huge!
MONJORONSON: The rewards will be huge! And
remember, that in the beginning, there is the team initiator, the organizer, and this individual has that role, at that time.
Who the team chooses to become the facilitator is another matter altogether. Being the organizer and initiator of the team
does not necessarily mean that that person will become the facilitator. Many times, for organizers and originators of a team,
those skills are good for that purpose, but work against them as a competent, capable, facilitator.
The spiritual quality of the
team
MMc: There seems to be one area that we may
have not touched upon in discussing the teams once they become involved, and that is there is a spiritual quality of the teams,
and you would like to see that spiritual quality at its highest level. [Correct?]
MONJORONSON: Yes, you will find that teams
that have a spiritual consultant will be more likely to stay on target and maintain their focus in the immediate perspective
and a very long-term perspective. Those teams which do not have a spiritual consultant, but have a mortal consultant to fill
that role will have less restraint from engaging in topics and subjects and social issues, which are not productive. We will
work with mortal teams who are neutral, who have a social interest to improve the welfare of your societies, even those who
do not use a spiritual consultant, as they can be highly productive and highly influential and provide a positive outcome
as well.
We are here to advise you, much as parents who have
had a tremendous amount of experience and do not want to see their children go through the same difficulties that they did,
so they voluntarily share their wisdom to their children, even before the children ask. This will help you.
The intentions of “Healing
a Broken World”
MMc: In the upcoming book, “Healing a
Broken World,” the original intent for that book was to be a demonstration of how to work a design team, was there any
intention on your part for us to explain who you are, or go into any mention of the Correcting Time, in that book?
MONJORONSON: There is a dual purpose, intention,
for this book. One is to provide instructions of how to develop design teams, and how to build sustainable social processes,
organizations and institutions, which would then lend themselves to sustainable social policies and laws. The second intention
was to introduce to the broad global public that the Spiritual Management of this planet is deeply invested and involved,
particularly in this current era of earth’s history—and I use the word “earth” as it begins to tell
you of our orientation that spirit is involved in particular at this time—as there are social developments and environmental
elements which are evolving to such an extent and so rapidly that they overwhelm and overcome the capacity and capability
of human individuals and human organizations, whether those organizations are in the community and your nations, or in the
congress of nations. These problems are so huge they are beyond the capacity and capability of human mortals to resolve. This
world represents an investment by the spiritual realm that it is worthy of being provided help with its growth.
The requirement of co-creative
participation
It requires the co-creative participation of earth’s
mortals, the inhabitants, to assist us to do this, as there is “no free lunch.” To heal this world it will require
the co-creative participation of mortals so that they have a commitment, an investment and an ideal that they wish to fulfill.
The third aspect of the second intention is that we not create such a diversion in the thinking of readers who want to be
of service co-creatively with us, that they are diverted from participating effectively in this work by focusing on my being,
my arrival, upon “The Urantia Book,” the Teaching Mission or the Magisterial Mission. These can be mentioned in
passing, very lightly, without deep discussion or explanation for several reasons: One, is that we do not want people to become
diverted in their intention, but to focus their efforts to assist us in this co-creative program; and secondly, to be available
to participate with us. We wish to generate a curiosity among those who have a positive inclination to do so.
There of course will be some, who are inclined to
do the research, so that they can “poke holes” in what is occurring. You will always find in any crowd, at any
parade, that there are individuals who throw tomatoes and rocks at the participants in the parade—it is simply their
nature—but of the main audience, the bystanders wish that they could be a part of the parade as well, and they will
take interest in it. So, our main focus is upon those individuals who will do the research diligently, capably, competently
and put this into their “library of awareness,” so that they can be more capable and competent in assisting us.
Am I clear so far with you?
MMc: Yes, you are. Yes.
The main thrust is social regeneration
through spiritual influence
MONJORONSON: It is important that the main
thrust be of social regeneration that is provided to mortals on this world through a spiritual influence. We are not looking
to get converts. The emphasis is not upon conversion or even convincing people that this is a spiritually developmental program.
Those people who are spiritually inclined will understand this already; those who do not can participate quite effectively
without any spiritual reference. In the sum total of all this, you must be quite amazed that we are so egalitarian, and that
we are not trying to sell our program and get more people on the bandwagon. That is not the function of our work; that is
the function of Thought Adjusters, guardian angels and celestial teachers.
We are trying to create a global social environment
that is conducive to the work of Thought Adjusters, guardian angels and celestial teachers, where families can come into existence
that are sustainable and have sustainable family practices that bring sustainable individuals into existence. This is first
and foremost the most important part of my program. The eventual fulfillment of the spiritual nature of our work will become
self-evident before many years or decades pass. Always it seems that mortals are always seeking the end point, getting to
the end first, before going through the process of achieving that.
Celestial intent is global
Those of you who are invested in the programs I mentioned,
those three programs, would like to see the whole world created into “Urantia Book” readers, who are thoroughly
involved in channeling. That’s very wonderful, but it is not a reality and it is not one that we anticipate or expect
to come into existence any time soon. If we can convince the broad global public of the rationality and logic and reasoning
of our involvement and this program of social sustainability as useful to everyone, believers and non-believers, we will have
achieved a major portion of our initial part of this mission. Doing that effectively helps the decades and centuries ahead,
where people more easily begin to see the positive effect of the constructive work that we have invested ourselves in, and
that other mortals have invested in as being the right way to go; then you will have a tremendous conversion when people see
pragmatically the results of involvement and investment in these programs.
Other questions?
A book of celestial teachings
concerning social sustainability
Roxie: Yes, I have one along this line, Monjoronson.
At one time in the past, you requested that we put up a web site that included all of your advice and counsel to our planet.
I was not able to generate enough interest in getting help on web design, in order to accomplish that. Recently, Byron suggested
that I take the information that you and Sondjah have given about the co-creative design teams, that I cull that information
out of the transcripts and combine them into a single volume that could be a companion to the other books that we will be
producing on working together in teams. Is this something that you agree with, and do you have any specific points that you
would like me to include in this?
MONJORONSON: Yes, definitely! Yes, you are
quite correct. Whether it is a web site or whether it is a book, the requirements for either one is that the information,
the data, the relevant materials be excised from the broad archives of all the transcripts in the last 25 years, so that they
are focused and concentrated and brought together into one compendium. The web site is an eventuality, as the book is an eventuality.
The first step is to bring all of these together,
and it is our wish that these be brought together first. Then, how to organize them and develop them and present them is another
piece of work, and how to eventually publish them is another. We do see these works, these transcripts, this collection that
pertains to design teams, the Correcting Time and so on, be available through the Internet, and hopefully and eventually that
they will be converted into several languages as well. But the most immediate first chore to do, which you have a tremendous
acquaintance-ship with, is to gather all of those sessions together into one folder on your computer, for example, and then
search for those which are also related from other teachers and other transmitters.
Other questions?
Roxie: Not at this time, however, perhaps later.
MONJORONSON: Is there any part of my suggestions
or guidelines to you where you seek further information or clarity? (Roxie: Not that I can think of at the moment.)
You probably will have great ease of discerning these
lessons from the time that you began as an active transcriptionist for the work that has come through this one. We suggest
that you advertise to your Teaching Mission and Magisterial Mission community, anyone who has earlier references that are
prior to this time. You would, of course, want to begin your first search from the earliest suggestions of my existence and
continue forward from that time. You, however, may find references from Christ Michael and others who make reference to the
Correcting Time and to the development of various missions involved in the Correcting Time, prior to my mention of my arrival.
Roxie: That’s very good; thank you for
that piece of information. That will be helpful.
MMc: I have a question: TMarchives and the
Daynal Institute are two different archives that have taken the Teaching Mission sessions and tried to work with them and
archive them. Are you talking about something different here than just archiving them? Are we trying to produce… are
you asking Roxie to produce a book that has some other purpose than just archiving the material?
MONJORONSON: Yes, definitely. We are suggesting
that all of these transcripts be brought together and organized, and that they be made into a library. An archive is simply
a retrieval and storage of all relevant information, chronologically. An operational library has an index; it has a means
of search; it has a means by which its internal data can be organized and searched by readers and those who access the site.
Her function first is to bring all this material together, and she will have completed the major portion of what is needed
in the future. The second chore will be then for someone to develop a web site, or even before a web site, a method of searching
the content of that library, so that it can be useful. Why gather together several chests of tools for a mechanic to use,
if you have never given him the key to open the chest? So, there must be keys made available for individuals to research its
contents; to not provide those tools, makes our work much more difficult for individuals to co-creatively work with us. It
is important that this not be an archive, but that it be an actual, working library. Does this help?
Roxie: Yes, it helps me a lot. Thank you.
MONJORONSON: You have already done a great
deal of work through your topical headings that you use for each transcript. These will be a source of indexing of the contents.
It will assist in a much more rapid process search. Of course, any good book would have a glossary and have an index, a bibliography
and related works and various authors or teachers, angels, celestial beings, et cetera, as well as the channels who brought
them through. Think of this as a working database and you will be far ahead of the game that way, as you bring these documents
together.
Roxie: You’ve been a great help
to me today, Monjoronson. I appreciate it very much.
MONJORONSON: You are welcome. We wish you to
make a separate annotation, appendix to the book, by taking each listing of topics in each transcript and putting them in
an appendix of topics covered, and each one having the heading, the date of each major element of the discussion. Do you understand?
Roxie: Yes, I do. Thank you.
Seeking clarification on an
old recommendation
MMc: Back in May, you gave us a list of the
books that you’d like to see published and some idea of the dates that you would like to see them come out. A lot has
changed in our publishing group since May. I wonder if you would refresh that list for me, please? Or refresh my mind about
that list?
MONJORONSON: Certainly. And first of all, I
would like to congratulate you on seeking clarification of an old recommendation that we made to you. There is a lesson here
for all of you: Oftentimes, when you take our recommendations or guidelines to you, you chisel them in granite and you think
that they live forever. However, you know as well, that the circumstances that are around you in your world are constantly
in flux. Therefore, it is useful and helpful to you and to us when you check again, just as you are doing this moment, on
what was given you to do in the past. Is this part clear so far? (MMc: Oh yes, it is.) So it helps make those old guides
and those recommendations for activities relevant to the moment. As you know, we only work in the moment, the ‘now,’
and have tremendous forgetfulness about the past and its requirements. We work with fresh requirements every “day”
so that we always remain relevant to the future. The past is the past; the present is only as good as it can act and bring
about the future.
Books planned for publication
To answer your question: The list is one that is developmental;
it is not necessarily chronological. Yes, we would like to see these books published “now,” as this now moment
gives us the most power and opportunity to affect the future. However, knowing that you are unable to bring these into existence
instantaneously, we ask that this book now, the “Healing a Broken World,” be published promptly, and that there
be work initiated on “Designing a Sustainable Society and Democracy”—I say “work on that” as
there will be another book, which will come along, which will probably, we anticipate, will be published before “Designing
Sustainable Societies and Democracies,” and that will be the “Morality for a Sustainable Civilization.”
This will be published, perhaps, very closely to that of “Designing Sustainable Societies and Democracies.” These
three books will give a tremendously uniform approach to anyone who reads all three of them, in how to engage the socially
sustainable principles, processes and design team work in the society in very pragmatic terms. Anyone who reads all three
of these books will have a tremendous insight into the look or the actual design of future societies on your world.
Concerning the announcement
of disintegration of your societies
One thing that is not emphasized in any of them, [and]
that is not given much attention, are the cataclysms and the disintegration of your societies. This will be minor and major
in some degree throughout the entire world, yet it will speak of the necessity of reorganizing your societies in more sustainable
terms, pragmatically. You want to engage principles and practices and policies and laws that actually do support the sustainability,
the ongoing operation of society. Inherent flaws—you call them “design flaws” in your manufacturing, or
you call them “designed obsolescence” and other terms—and we are striving to remove all of those elements,
which bring about the natural destruction and disintegration of societies, by giving you a design process that brings about
ongoing pragmatic functional sustainability of a society, a short-term of 50 years, a mid-term of 250 years, and a long-term
of 500 years to several thousand.
One of the lessons inherent in these three books,
is that if these attributes of sustainability are not embedded and invested in your social organizations, then you are actually
designing the obsolescence and eventual decline and disintegration of your societies. Once this awareness hits in, and large
sections of the populace are seeing the disintegration of their societies and cultures and communities around them, [they]
will also see an immediate need for removing obsolescent, antiquarian, self-destructive social policies, procedures and laws
in their communities and societies.
MMc: Should we be looking at saying more about
the decline of our institutions and of society in our books, or is that going to be such a vivid situation that nobody is
going to miss it?
MONJORONSON: The elements that need to be emphasized
at this time are those obvious elements in the first part of earth’s dilemma, where those elements are made obvious
to the readers. You will find that with publication of this first book that there will be a marketing and development effort
that will also include workshops and speaking presentations, open seminar discussions and so on with the author and the principals
of the book, such that those questions and concerns will become open and evident in those discussions. You can anticipate
that this will begin in small meetings, but later televised and replicated and even included in instructional and teaching
environments, whose principal functions include that, one of which is the BBC and the other is what is called T.E.D., and
similar presentations. These are obvious eventualities that we see developing and will come to the public’s awareness
much more directly and vividly, as you say.
What is next? A pause to see
what the audience does
MMc: I’m going to go back to my original
question and ask you, where do you want to go from here? What do you want to talk about the next time we get together?
MONJORONSON: We would like to see what the
audience does. We have, if you recall our conversations with you over the last 10, 11 or 12 years, you will see that we have
made a “push,” and then we have withdrawn and waited and paused, and then we come forward again with another push,
and so we have come forward repeatedly, much as the lapping waves of the ocean, where the surf withdraws and gathers its strength
and comes forward with another wave and much clamor and noise and movement of sand and water, and then withdraws again. We
are at this point now, going to withdraw, but be open to your discussions and to your actions. And when we say “you,”
and “your,” we mean the larger “you” and the larger “your,” as you take ownership and
make a listing of the options that you have and choose the best options, and then make a decision on one option and then take
action upon it. Rest assured that after a pause, with no one taking any notice, that we will again come forward. However,
it may be with a different topic and different subject, or under a different environmental situation. But you can rest assured
that we will have to do with developing your world into a world that is entering light and life, and it will also involve
the co-creative participation with you.
MMc: Well, I’ll make my email address
available to our readers, and hope that they contact us with questions during this interim. momccray12348@gmail.com
MONJORONSON: Yes. You personally may wish to
begin by contacting others in the medical profession around the nation, who might be interested in initiating their own sustainability
design team in their own locale, and using your collective intelligence from various individuals in various states to assist
in that process. This will help several of you eliminate the need to reinvent the wheel, so to speak, for developing topics
for your local teams. Your next step would be to then solicit those who may be interested in developing a local team, or at
least to meet and discuss this socially, and to see if there is any bonding that may exist.
MMc: I don’t have any more questions
for today. We thank you very much, Monjoronson. Would you like to say some closing words for us?
We are not being abandoned by
the celestials
MONJORONSON: Yes. In no case are we abandoning
you. It is the case of the parent where they show and tell and teach, and then wait for the child to move forward and enact
or re-enact as best they can, the directions and instructions of the parent or the teacher and the trainer. And so, we are
always present, we are not leaving you. We will be here; we will be furtively engaging in any mind, any point of light that
exists to show itself and inquire as to our availability and our assistance. It is a matter of training you to work with us
co-creatively. We are finding that to be a very slow process.
Thank you, and we wish you a good day, and please
know that we are present with you and that I personally volunteer Sondjah to work with you as you develop your teams; that
is his field of expertise, although Charles and myself are always readily available as is Nebadonia’s team of highly
capable helpers in the hierarchy of light. Thank you and good day.
````````````````````````````
